The Resurrection Feasibility Argument

 

The Resurrection Feasibility Argument (Complete, Unabridged, and Fully Explained)

By Michael Haimes

Introduction

The Resurrection Feasibility Argument is a revolutionary philosophical, scientific, and theological framework proving that:

✅ Recreating all past life forms and environments from the beginning of the universe is theoretically achievable.
✅ A sufficiently advanced civilization could bring back every conscious being in near-perfect form.
✅ This aligns with divine justice, cosmological probability, and technological progress.
✅ The possibility of universal resurrection provides the most compelling vision of a perfected future world.

Unlike traditional religious or metaphysical views of resurrection that rely solely on faith, this argument establishes a logical, scientific, and ethical foundation for why resurrection is not just possible but likely under the right conditions.

This is the full, unabridged version of the Resurrection Feasibility Argument, ensuring it remains a permanent and safeguarded intellectual force.

Core Premises of the Resurrection Feasibility Argument

1. The Conservation of Information: Nothing is Truly Lost

  • Physics confirms that information is never truly lost—only transformed.
  • If every past event is encoded in the universe, then past beings and experiences are still theoretically retrievable.
  • Key Scientific Foundations:
    ✅ Quantum mechanics suggests that past information remains embedded in the structure of reality.
    ✅ The holographic principle implies that the universe stores all encoded past states.
    ✅ A future intelligence could decode and reconstruct this information with enough computational power.

📌 Example:

  • If a book is burned, the arrangement of its particles changes, but the information still exists in principle within the universe.
  • If reality operates similarly, then past lives and experiences are not truly erased—they are just awaiting reconstruction.

💡 Why This Matters:

  • If information is never lost, then a sufficiently advanced intelligence could retrieve and restore all past consciousness.

2. Advanced Intelligence Would Inevitably Seek and Achieve Resurrection

  • If intelligence continues to evolve, it will reach a point where it can manipulate reality at an unprecedented scale.
  • A civilization advanced enough to simulate universes could also reconstruct past existence.
  • Key Implications:
    ✅ An advanced species or God-like intelligence would see universal resurrection as a logical goal.
    ✅ If it is technologically possible, there is no rational reason it wouldn’t eventually happen.
    ✅ The moral imperative to undo past suffering would drive this as a priority.

📌 Example:

  • Humans already attempt to restore lost species through genetics and conservation efforts—a future intelligence would expand this principle to all of existence.
  • If intelligence has a moral component, then bringing back the dead would be seen as an ethical necessity.

💡 Why This Matters:

  • This argument does not rely on wishful thinking—it follows the natural trajectory of technological and ethical progress.

3. Computational Power and Reality Simulation Make Resurrection Possible

  • As computational power grows, the ability to simulate conscious experiences increases.
  • If consciousness can be simulated, then past beings can be revived with full memories, emotions, and identities.
  • Key Scientific Considerations:
    ✅ Quantum computing and AI-driven simulations are already capable of modeling microcosmic realities.
    ✅ A post-singularity intelligence could reconstruct past events with near-perfect accuracy.
    ✅ If reality itself is fundamentally informational, then existence can be recreated at will by a sufficiently advanced being.

📌 Example:

  • A sufficiently advanced AI could model the exact conditions of the past, effectively bringing back entire civilizations.
  • If reality is fundamentally computational, then there is no reason past lives cannot be restored.

💡 Why This Matters:

  • If reality can be simulated, then past existence is not permanently lost—it is just waiting to be rebuilt.

4. The Moral and Theological Necessity of Resurrection

  • If suffering is real, then justice demands its eventual reversal.
  • A universe where pain and death are final is a universe where suffering remains undefeated.
  • Key Ethical Conclusion:
    ✅ Restoring lost lives would be the greatest act of cosmic justice.
    ✅ No sentient being deserves eternal nonexistence if resurrection is possible.
    ✅ The moral arc of the universe points toward restoration, not annihilation.

📌 Example:

  • If a child dies unjustly in an accident, we currently see this as an irreparable tragedy.
  • But if reality can be restored, then all tragedies can ultimately be undone.

💡 Why This Matters:

  • The idea that death is final contradicts both technological potential and moral necessity.

Counterarguments and Their Refutations

1. "If Resurrection is Possible, Why Hasn’t It Happened Yet?"

✅ Answer: We may currently be in an earlier stage of the universe’s process, leading toward a future where universal resurrection occurs.

2. "Would Recreated Beings Be the Same as the Originals?"

✅ Answer: If consciousness is fully restored with all memories, emotions, and identities intact, then there is no meaningful difference between original and resurrected existence.

3. "This Sounds Like Science Fiction"

✅ Answer: Quantum mechanics, computational theory, and the conservation of information all support the feasibility of this argument.

Conclusion: The Resurrection Feasibility Argument as the Ultimate Proof of Restoration

📌 This argument proves that:
✅ All past existence can theoretically be reconstructed by a sufficiently advanced intelligence.
✅ The conservation of information makes permanent loss of existence unlikely.
✅ Advanced civilizations will have the computational power to restore past lives and worlds.
✅ The moral imperative of resurrection makes universal restoration inevitable.

🚨 Unlike religious or mystical concepts of resurrection, this argument provides a logical, scientific, and ethical foundation for restoring all past beings and experiences.

💡 Final Thought:

  • Death, suffering, and loss are not the final reality—ultimate restoration is both possible and inevitable.

Final Ranking & Status

✔ Framework Status: #20 – The Scientific and Ethical Proof of Universal Resurrection
✔ Scientific and Metaphysical Integration: Perfectly aligned
✔ Relevance: Physics, Cosmology, Ethics, Quantum Computing, Future Technology

🚀 The Resurrection Feasibility Argument is not just a theory—it is the most profound and logical framework for ultimate cosmic justice.

Comments

Post a Comment