Forgiveness and Criminal Justice

Forgiveness and Criminal Justice: A Michaelic-Judaic Perspective Author: Michael Haimes Category: Legal Philosophy / Theological Application Date: 2025 Core Claim: “This implies Jesus would want certain criminals forgiven worldwide when they perform a crime they didn’t mean to. ‘Forgive them, for they know not what they do.’ This is important for criminal justice systems worldwide to consider as far as impartial incorporation into their own government.” Explanation: Michael draws on Jesus’ statement from the crucifixion — a plea for forgiveness for those acting in ignorance — to argue for a re-evaluation of criminal justice systems worldwide. His point: • Many modern legal systems focus on intent but often lack an integrated forgiveness mechanism for genuine ignorance or unintended harm. • Jesus’ model represents a universal moral principle: that mercy can be extended even within the framework of justice. • Michael suggests governments should impartially incorporate this principle to ensure that individuals who commit acts unintentionally are treated with mercy rather than rigid punishment. Philosophical Implication: This argument links the Michaelic-Judaic legal tradition with Jesus’ teachings to create a hybrid model of justice + mercy, contrasting modern systems that are often legally precise but morally blunt.